Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 07:21:47 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: "Muenz, Michael" <m.muenz@spam-fetish.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10g IPsec ? Message-ID: <36b236ce-cac3-f454-df9d-66483bf84128@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <9ebdf1d3-03da-6a4c-a9ea-aafee93eccd8@spam-fetish.org> References: <20191104194637.GA71627@home.opsec.eu> <20191105191514.GG8521@funkthat.com> <9ebdf1d3-03da-6a4c-a9ea-aafee93eccd8@spam-fetish.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
06.11.2019 4:55, Muenz, Michael wrote: > These were my short results via OPNsense on 4 year old XEONs. > So its 11.2, mostly untuned and strongswan as IPsec implementation. > If you need more detailed specs just drop me a line. > > https://www.routerperformance.net/comparing-opnsense-vpn-performance/ Was it strongswan in user-level IPsec processing mode or kernel-level?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36b236ce-cac3-f454-df9d-66483bf84128>