From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 20:48:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4106909; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9AF2BA7; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AF55E33C48; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:48:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10 References: <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:48:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Craig Rodrigues's message of "Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:43:55 -0700") Message-ID: <44y4wvz2ie.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-current Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:48:16 -0000 Craig Rodrigues writes: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: >> >> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >>>Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to >>>FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD >>>10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT >>>host with bmake? >> >> You would likely need to apply many of the changes made in 10. >> IIRC stable/9 has just enough bmake support to be able to build/install >> bmake itself, so that ports can use it. >> >> I'm not sure how many people would appreciate making such changes to >> stable/9 at this point. > > Most users would not care about building stable/9 on a stable/10 host. > There are only a few people care about being able to do that. > People who use poudriere to build a jail to build ports would care. Couldn't they just build the base in that same jail?