Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 19:13:04 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Atsushi Onoe <onoe@sm.sony.co.jp> Cc: joe@pavilion.net, mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent changes to pccard, pcic, etc. Message-ID: <199912090213.TAA08331@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 09 Dec 1999 07:59:02 %2B0900." <199912082259.HAA26803@duplo.sm.sony.co.jp> References: <199912082259.HAA26803@duplo.sm.sony.co.jp> <199912081806.LAA05338@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199912082259.HAA26803@duplo.sm.sony.co.jp> Atsushi Onoe writes: : Calling if_detach() for interfaces with address causes the inconsistency, : and re-assigning new address for the interface, e.g. dhcp, makes it worse. : Perhaps you could avoid the problem if you delete all address *before* : you remove the card and *before* you suspend the PC. I tried this, I think, but still had some problems. : Or you can try my ad hoc patch attached. Though it is not the right fix, : it works fine for me even with dhcp. What makes it wrong? It is working for me right now. Is there a more generic way to do this properly? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912090213.TAA08331>