From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 21:15:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C1716A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:15:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E8D43D58 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:15:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9RLFYd1060056; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:15:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9RLFW0k060051; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:15:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:15:31 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Zoltan Frombach Message-ID: <20041027211531.GC59489@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20041027173212.GA59754@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041027190416.GA70873@ei.bzerk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Ruben de Groot cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Portupgrade -af question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:15:42 -0000 On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:34:51PM -0700, Zoltan Frombach wrote: > >Yes. Wouldn't it be a nice feature for "portupgrade -P" to install the > >port instead of the package if any non-defaults were defined in > >pkgtools.conf? > > If you really want to add this to portupgrade, it should be optional, > though. Because someone might have a broken compiler or something and just > wants to install a binary package quickly. In that case it should be > possible to force a binary package installation regardless of what's inside > the pkgtools.conf file. Don't you agree? 'portupgrade -PP' can still be used for that. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)