From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  3 09:50:03 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16A01065674
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  3 May 2008 09:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6BF8FC14
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  3 May 2008 09:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m439o3TW078966
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 3 May 2008 09:50:03 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m439o3qF078965;
	Sat, 3 May 2008 09:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 09:50:03 GMT
Message-Id: <200805030950.m439o3qF078965@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/122652: [patch] du(1) support for inode count
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 09:50:03 -0000

The following reply was made to PR bin/122652; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Cc: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: bin/122652: [patch] du(1) support for inode count
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 13:43:23 +0400

 Well, du doesn't count size multiple times in case of hard links,
 so why should the same loop count inodes the wrong way? I just
 tested, and it acts as expected: neither "df -i" nor "du -i"
 counters increase when a new hard link is created.