From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  2 13:40:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A787416A4CE; Tue,  2 Mar 2004 13:40:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 51BA943D1D; Tue,  2 Mar 2004 13:40:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru)
Received: from iclub.nsu.ru ([193.124.215.97] ident=root)
	by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1AyHf5-0002Pv-56; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 03:42:47 +0600
Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (fjoe@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by iclub.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22LeQYw043091;
	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 03:40:26 +0600 (NS)
	(envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru)
Received: (from fjoe@localhost)
	by iclub.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22LeMV9043090;
	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 03:40:22 +0600 (NS)
	(envelope-from fjoe)
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 03:40:22 +0600
From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>
To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040302214022.GC42471@iclub.nsu.ru>
References: <4043B6BA.B847F081@freebsd.org>
	<00d301c40089$8a035410$c000000a@jd2400> <4044F8E1.F10CFD37@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4044F8E1.F10CFD37@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
cc: James Read <james@physicalsegment.com>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack (vimage)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:40:31 -0000

Hello!

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:13:05PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:

> The patch set is pretty extensive and intrusive and only for 4.x.  Adding
> locking for 5.x would be a pretty nice challenge as well and not easy to
> get right for all cases.
> 
> > This is one thing that I would like to use, without patching systems. But
> > then thats just my 'wish list' opinion of it.
> 
> I think is makes more sense to get something like userland BSD.

Userland BSD might need too many resources.
Think of hosting providers who run hundreds or thousands of virtual hosts
in a jail. Please take a look at commercial solutions like FreeVPS by H-Sphere
or Virtuozzo by SWSoft.

Virtualized network stack is not an academic-research only feature.

/fjoe