From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  5 10:41:50 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4786137B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Jun 2003 10:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7205843FAF
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Jun 2003 10:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 27816 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Jun 2003 17:41:49 -0000
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <3EDF78DE.8070206@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20030605103316.B27787@root.org>
References: <005d01c32b83$e00bdd90$0a00000a@eps>
	<137270000.1054832665@lerlaptop.iadfw.net>
	<3EDF78DE.8070206@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: 'Lars Eggert' <larse@ISI.EDU>
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
cc: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2332] Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 17:41:50 -0000

On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > For the record, yesterday's sources STILL produce the panic at 0x7 for
> > me on transition to battery.
> >
> > I can get more crashdumps/kernels if someone asks.
> > I've mentioned this for the last ~1.5 months.
>
> The official position is that ACPI is in a transition period right now,
> and that while that gets worked out we encourage people to disable it on
> their systems if they are not in a position to actively debug and fix
> it.

For those who find they may need to disable acpi, you can selectively
disable different components.  Larry, since yours is on battery
transition, try "debug.acpi.disable.ec=1" or possibly one of the other
options.  I recall that you had a thermal problem also.

For Paul, who was having irq probing issues, try
"hw.acpi.pci.link.%d.%d.%d.irq" to set it explicitly while leaving ACPI
enabled.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=acpi&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+5.0-current&format=html

I have been working on Campi's and LER's problems.  But I only do this in
my free time.  Your best bet is acpi-jp@ as the Intel people are very good
at this.  Several other BSD users have been stepping up to help on that
list and they are very much appreciated.

-Nate