From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 26 9:41: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from guild.plethora.net (guild.plethora.net [205.166.146.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC90A37B503 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:41:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from seebs@guild.plethora.net) Received: from guild.plethora.net (seebs@localhost.plethora.net [127.0.0.1]) by guild.plethora.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1QHf4619958 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:41:04 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200102261741.f1QHf4619958@guild.plethora.net> From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) Reply-To: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:37:43 MST." <15002.37991.500583.137739@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:41:04 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <15002.37991.500583.137739@nomad.yogotech.com>, Nate Williams writes : >Again, memory overcommit is only *one* class of bugs that is avoided. >The phrase "can't see the forest for the trees" jumps to mind. :) Sure, and likewise, bugs in libc are only one *class* of bugs we can avoid, but that doesn't mean we don't fix them. -s To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message