From owner-freebsd-git@freebsd.org Wed Mar 1 12:06:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-git@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A23CF2478 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4F6764 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8D923CF2477; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: git@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7F7CF2475 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.codepro.be", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5692B763; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.16.5.2] (vega.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::3]) (Authenticated sender: kp) by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EEE81ECD6; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:06:56 +0100 (CET) From: "Kristof Provost" To: "=?utf-8?q?Bart=C5=82omiej?= Rutkowski" Cc: "Warner Losh" , git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pull requests Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:07:16 +0100 Message-ID: <5D8FF3CD-422C-489A-B009-454CA1031E5E@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6080) X-BeenThere: freebsd-git@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of git use in the FreeBSD project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:06:58 -0000 On 1 Mar 2017, at 13:00, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote: > Don't get me wrong, I am simply trying to understand what exactly > would > that accomplish - see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9649. Lets, for a > fun > thought experiment, imagine it was an GH pull request that was > transferred > to Phabric. What now? 2 weeks passed and nothing happened. Would any > policy > fix that? > No, the best policy in the world isn’t going to fix lack of time. It might help a little if these at least all land on the same pile, but it’s not going to magic up reviewers. I’m not sure anything would. A possibly policy answer would be that reviews are automatically closed after a while. It’s not great, but at least the submitter knows that nothing is going to happen. Leaving it open forever also accomplishes nothing. Regards, Kristof