From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 8 11:56:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5783DD70D5; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B42D83135; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1df37j-000K9C-Cs; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 14:56:35 +0300 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 14:56:35 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: FreeBSD Net , FreeBSD Stable , Ben RUBSON , hiren , jch Subject: Re: mlx4en, timer irq @100%... (11.0 stuck on high network load ???) Message-ID: <20170808115635.GY1585@zxy.spb.ru> References: <2ADA8C57-2C2D-4F97-9F0B-82D53EDDC649@gmail.com> <061cdf72-6285-8239-5380-58d9d19a1ef7@selasky.org> <92BEE83D-498F-47D5-A53C-39DCDC00A0FD@gmail.com> <5d8960d8-e1ff-8719-320f-d3ae84054714@selasky.org> <6B4A35F7-5694-4945-9575-19ADB678F9FA@gmail.com> <297a784a-3d80-b1a6-652e-a78621fe5a8b@selasky.org> <3ECCFBF1-18D9-4E33-8F39-0C366C3BB8B4@gmail.com> <20170808113352.GH18123@zxy.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 11:56:38 -0000 On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 01:49:08PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 08/08/17 13:33, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > TW_RUNLOCK(V_tw_lock); > > and > > if (INP_INFO_TRY_WLOCK(&V_tcbinfo)) { > > > > `inp` can be invalidated, freed and this pointer may be invalid? > > If you look one line up there is a pcbref ?? Yes. Can different thread take this inp and freed it? May be timer thread?