From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 15 23:54:45 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA63106564A;
	Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:54:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eadler@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFED08FC0A;
	Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:54:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8FNsjo3004596;
	Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:54:45 GMT
	(envelope-from eadler@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from eadler@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8FNsjmS004428;
	Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:54:45 GMT (envelope-from eadler)
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:54:45 GMT
Message-Id: <201209152354.q8FNsjmS004428@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: tejblum@yandex-team.ru, eadler@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: eadler@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/79048: [libc] realloc() copies data even when the size of
	allocated memory decrease
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:54:46 -0000

Synopsis: [libc] realloc() copies data even when the size of allocated memory decrease

State-Changed-From-To: suspended->closed
State-Changed-By: eadler
State-Changed-When: Sat Sep 15 23:54:44 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why: 
we use jemalloc which may not behave the same way. in either case this
was not originally a bug. close the pr

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79048