From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 08:12:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420C016A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:12:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz [66.92.171.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB6843D21 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:12:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz) Received: by mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Postfix, from userid 80) id EA9DD22C; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:12:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from 141.156.69.109 ([141.156.69.109]) by www.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:12:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20031210111222.k44gcgkgkoskcwkw@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:12:22 -0500 From: Kenneth Culver To: Eriq Lamar References: <200312092243.02269.eqe@cox.net> <1071030635.14355.7.camel@merlin> In-Reply-To: <1071030635.14355.7.camel@merlin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why support alpha?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:12:08 -0000 Quoting Eriq Lamar : > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 22:53, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0500, eqe@cox.net wrote: > > > Isn't alpha dead? Why bother supporting them in 5.2 it seems like wasted > > > energy. Yes people still use it but for them there is 4.9 which works > > > fine. You could better serve the freebsd community by focusing on the > > > future of computing like amd64, great dual support, better drivers, etc. > > > and most people know this, so why not let alpha die. I personally like > > > alpha but it has no future. > > > > > > What is the purpose of this email?!? > 1. why not read the message body I think I explained it in plain > english. > > So what's your point? > 2. for my point read 1. > Sending mail like this is pretty much flamebait. Alpha is not dead, and last I heard whoever owns rights to it this week is still releasing new hardware, although they aren't hyping it at all. Ken