From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 12 19:35:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1624E106566B; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFE28FC0C; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (host86-180-59-125.range86-180.btcentralplus.com [86.180.59.125]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BECB46B0D; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:35:48 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Robert N. M. Watson" In-Reply-To: <9ace436c1003121056q1ebc90f6gf9f87c54dd187a20@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:35:46 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <821C1A82-27B6-4E09-9B56-93A687BE6445@freebsd.org> References: <201003111756.o2BHukJu042449@svn.freebsd.org> <9ace436c1003111530s3bd0de9cq451671909fb6aa64@mail.gmail.com> <9ace436c1003111539t2af8439cn315c695d4b90e28d@mail.gmail.com> <4B99EA09.80108@elischer.org> <20100312151931.GS37184@FreeBSD.org> <9ace436c1003121056q1ebc90f6gf9f87c54dd187a20@mail.gmail.com> To: Qing Li X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Juli Mallett , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff , Julian Elischer , svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r205024 - head/sys/net X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:35:50 -0000 On Mar 12, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Qing Li wrote: > Right now I like to implement Robert's suggestion of using = if_capabilities > field. I'd like to create a new flag, IFCAP_LINKSTATE_NOTIFY flag. > The routing decision will check against the if_link_state if this bit > is set. >=20 > Only a handful of drivers have this capability. So updating those = drivers > is a small task. >=20 > Do we agree on this approach? I'm good with this approach -- do you mind going with IFCAP_LINKSTATE or = something similarly a bit shorter? Most of the other capability names = are pretty short, and it will prevent the display in ifconfig from = growing too much as the capability will be common. Thanks! Robert=