From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Oct 19  7:20: 8 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F8737B405
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 07:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f9JEK4Q95768;
	Fri, 19 Oct 2001 07:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 07:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200110191420.f9JEK4Q95768@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Subject: Re: ports/31274: Update port: graphics/kuickshow
Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/31274; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, anders@fix.no
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/31274: Update port: graphics/kuickshow
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:19:53 -0500

 I think as per previous discussion we in ports@ we have decided to leave 
 your name in the pkg-descr.  How do you feel about this?
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message