From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 22 00:48:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661B316A4CE; Sat, 22 May 2004 00:48:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8249143D39; Sat, 22 May 2004 00:48:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4M7mDuh045944; Sat, 22 May 2004 09:48:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Scott Long From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 21 May 2004 20:09:35 MDT." <40AEB65F.2020905@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 09:48:13 +0200 Message-ID: <45943.1085212093@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Disk performance under CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 07:48:42 -0000 In message <40AEB65F.2020905@freebsd.org>, Scott Long writes: >PHK's plans to short-circuit direct device I/O away from VFS will be >interesting and will almost certainly have a performance benefit, 4% improvement in fsck in my tests. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.