Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Dec 1997 23:31:26 -0600
From:      Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>
To:        "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: nice question
Message-ID:  <19971213233126.62113@emsphone.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971213204729.14842B-100000@shell.futuresouth.com>; from "Matthew D. Fuller" on Sat Dec 13 20:51:22 GMT 1997
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.971213204729.14842B-100000@shell.futuresouth.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Dec 13), Matthew D. Fuller said:
> this may be a bug in nice, a bug in the manpage, or a bug in my
> understanding here. her's my understanding: nice sets a priority
> between -20 and 20 (I'm assuming running as root).  20 is the lowest
> priority, 0 is the highest normal priority.
> 
> Here's what I get:
> {~} root@mortis: %nice -20 top
> and I find this in the output:
> 21551 root     51 -20   640K   856K RUN      0:00  4.80%  0.46% top
>                  ^^^^
> Note that this is at -20, not +20.
> Then, if I do this:
> {~} root@mortis: %nice --20 top
> nice: Badly formed number.

Another reason not to use csh :)  Csh has a builtin 'nice' command with
different arguments than /usr/bin/nice.  man csh and search for 'nice'.

	-Dan Nelson
	dnelson@emsphone.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971213233126.62113>