From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 2 13:57:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B4C16A4CF for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:57:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EED743D39 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:57:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i32LvjpZ073963; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:57:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:57:45 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Sean McNeil Message-ID: <20040402215745.GB49311@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1080882894.5980.26.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20040402163353.GC6724@dan.emsphone.com> <1080940409.3711.1.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1080940409.3711.1.camel@server.mcneil.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs server issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:57:46 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 02), Sean McNeil said: > On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 08:33, Dan Nelson wrote: > > "tcpdump -s0" output might help here, I think. Do it from both > > machines and make sure no packets are being dropped, and then check > > to see what NFS request the client is trying to make that isn't > > getting processed. > > OK, here is a tcpdump. It is confusing. It looks like after the > first fragment is received it is looking up some bazaar IP > address.... > > 13:02:57.566952 free.mcneil.com.1360032988 > server.mcneil.com.nfs: 136 readdir fh 1002,54097/7890231 4096 bytes @ 0x000000000 (DF) > 13:02:57.567266 server.mcneil.com.nfs > free.mcneil.com.1360032988: reply ok 1472 readdir (frag 1645:1480@0+) > 13:02:57.567268 0.0.0.1 > 0.0.10.7: (frag 1645:4@1480) > 13:03:01.766943 arp who-has server.mcneil.com tell free.mcneil.com > 13:03:01.767040 arp reply server.mcneil.com is-at 0:d:61:27:4d:6b Weird. Is this at the server or the client? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com