From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 09:40:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5B1FF2 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [8.8.178.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60858FC0A for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9H9e2Ht077878 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9H9e2g9077877; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:40:02 GMT Message-Id: <201210170940.q9H9e2g9077877@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Dmitry Sukhodoyev Subject: Re: ports/172700: new port databases/mongodb22 NOSQL database X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dmitry Sukhodoyev List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:40:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/172700; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dmitry Sukhodoyev To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/172700: new port databases/mongodb22 NOSQL database Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 15:31:38 +0600 let it go to databases/mongodb. should i make new PR or current PR is sufficient? On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Dmitry Sukhodoyev wrote on 15.10.2012 00:16: >> >> >>> Number: 172700 >>> Category: ports >>> >>> Synopsis: new port databases/mongodb22 NOSQL database > > > [...] > >>> Description: >> >> mongodb 2.2.0 NOSQL database. possible should replace >> /usr/ports/databases/mongodb, but i don't sure. > > > They are fully compatible, so I'd say it should go into databases/mongodb > instead. > > -- > Regards, > Ruslan > > Tinderboxing kills... the drives.