From owner-freebsd-current Sat Oct 17 06:01:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA08700 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 06:01:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from oldnews.quick.net (oldnews.quick.net [207.212.170.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA08694; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from donegan@oldnews.quick.net) Received: (from donegan@localhost) by oldnews.quick.net (8.8.5/8.6.9) id GAA04524; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 06:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 06:00:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "Steven P. Donegan" To: Chuck Robey cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates/smp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 17 Oct 1998, Chuck Robey wrote: > > Keeping one rabbit's foot quite handy. > I'd rather not take up too much of the lists time on this - so my question is who is actively working on softupdates? My system(s) are Tyan Tomcat's - one a dual 133 with 256 meg RAM and the other a dual 233 with 256 meg, both have kernels stripped to the bone (ie no drivers in the kernel that are not needed) different drivers/boards on the two systems (ie nothing else really in common hardware-wise). Both panic, according to DDB, in softupdates code immediately after going SMP and tunefs -n enable. A long time back softupdates worked OK (somewhat) unless I did the make -j anything thing :-) Now it's a nice hard failure :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message