From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 28 17:34: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt052n3e.san.rr.com (dt052n3e.san.rr.com [204.210.33.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FFA37B5C3; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:33:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt052n3e.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA12333; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:33:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Message-ID: <39822668.FE05F964@gorean.org> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:33:44 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: Mark Ovens , Chris BeHanna , FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: src code freeze is over for RELENG_4 References: <20000729004706.D237@parish> <20000729020215.A69204@mithrandr.moria.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > The whole point of the crypto distribution was to protect people who > couldn't use crypto. That included France at one stage That wasn't the _whole_ point, by any stretch. However, the recent changes have brought light to the plight of those who have restrictions on crypto use not related to US patent/export issues, so the current trend of thought is to split the crypto stuff into its own distribution, which will be included by default. That may change before someone gets it implemented, but it seems to be the most logical course of action. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message