From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 16 19:42: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from harumscarum.mr.itd.umich.edu (harumscarum.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.125.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6050F37B400 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:41:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from tim.elnsng1.mi.home.com (c1129767-a.elnsng1.mi.home.com [24.183.248.20]) by harumscarum.mr.itd.umich.edu (8.9.3/3.3s) with SMTP id WAA13900; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:41:42 -0500 (EST) From: Tim McMillen To: Kwangyul Seo , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ipf/ipnatd vs ipfw/natd ? Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:46:06 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" References: <20010117122933.A11424@plus.or.kr> In-Reply-To: <20010117122933.A11424@plus.or.kr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01011622460600.00943@tim.elnsng1.mi.home.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tuesday January 16, 2001 22:29, Kwangyul Seo wrote: > > Hello, > > What's the main difference between ipfw/natd and ipf/ipnatd? I don't know. OpenBSD people swear by ipf, FreeBSD seems to prefer ipfw but allows both. > And where can I get detailed documents related to ipf/ipnatd? http://www.obfuscation.org/ipf/ is your friend. Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message