From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 14 09:46:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA17454 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 09:46:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.88.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA17444 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 09:46:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdkeys@seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu) Received: (from rdkeys@localhost) by seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA04799; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 12:44:41 -0500 (EST) From: "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" Message-Id: <199711141744.MAA04799@seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Subject: Can 2.2.5 install go from tar floppies rather than dos ones? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 12:44:40 -0500 (EST) Cc: rdkeys@seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (User RDKEYS Robert D. Keys) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I would be curious to know if floppy installs can be made to work from standard FreeBSD floppy tarball sets rather than having to port them to a dos floppy? I would think, in principle, that it should be possible functionally, but dunno whether that is possible in the /stand/sysinstall. A tar to tape is basically the same as a tar to floppies. Any pointers appreciated. Thanks Bob Keys rdkeys@seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu