From owner-freebsd-security Mon Apr 22 13:55:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC7F37B7F5 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id DA479AE24A; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:32:16 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: D J Hawkey Jr Cc: security at FreeBSD Subject: Re: Q about FreeBSD-SA-02:23.stdio Message-ID: <20020422203216.GR38320@elvis.mu.org> References: <20020422151956.A919@sheol.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020422151956.A919@sheol.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * D J Hawkey Jr [020422 13:27] wrote: > Hello All. > > Received this SA today, and I have but four questions: > > - Is this really only a kernel re-build and install thang? > - Shouldn't filedesc.h be copied to /usr/include/sys? Doesn't matter. > - libc (and therefore userland) really isn't involved at all? > - 'keyinit' was used as an example, but the hole is > just in the kernel? There's no hole in the kernel, this patch basically puts seatbelts in the kernel to protect against a very easy to make mistake. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message