From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Nov 22 00:44:31 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA23225 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 00:44:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp) Received: from tahoe.cinenet.net (root@ns1.cinenet.net [198.147.76.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA23210 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 00:44:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sraja@cinenet.net) Received: from hollywood.cinenet.net (hollywood.cinenet.net [198.147.76.75]) by tahoe.cinenet.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id AAA27851 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 00:44:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (sraja@localhost) by hollywood.cinenet.net (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA12632 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 00:44:24 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: hollywood.cinenet.net: sraja owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 00:44:24 -0800 (PST) From: Suresh Rajagopalan To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Ethernet card for NFS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk For a Freebsd NFS server, I'm looking for a NIC with a decent amount of cache memory. Most of the 10/100 NIC's on the market have very small buffer caches, typically < 8k . This used to be a big problem in the ISA/EISA days. Is it no longer a problem with the PCI NIC's? Thanks Suresh