From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 14:09:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845531065670 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Received: from mail.sagedata.net (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C008FC12 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SAGEPLACE (99-111-143-27.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.27]) by mail.sagedata.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p6LE9lop038018; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:09:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.sagedata.net: Host 99-111-143-27.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.27] claimed to be SAGEPLACE Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.20110721090949.01d9cfd8@sage-american.com> X-Sender: jacks@sage-american.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:09:49 -0500 To: Per olof Ljungmark , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Jack L. Stone" In-Reply-To: <4E275E7A.40904@intersonic.se> References: <3.0.1.32.20110720150751.018e5ee8@sage-american.com> <201107201122.44612.beech@freebsd.org> <3.0.1.32.20110720124733.018e5ee8@sage-american.com> <201107201122.44612.beech@freebsd.org> <3.0.1.32.20110720150751.018e5ee8@sage-american.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by Sendmail access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:09:48 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/1.15.388 (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:09:48 -0500 X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-10.00 required=4.50 X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-10.0 points, 4.5 required) | | pts rule name description | ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule | -10 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | Cc: Subject: Re: Horde-4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:49 -0000 At 01:02 AM 7/21/2011 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >On 07/20/11 22:07, Jack L. Stone wrote: >> At 11:38 AM 7/20/2011 -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote: >>> On Wednesday 20 July 2011 11:22:44 Beech Rintoul wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 20 July 2011 09:47:33 Jack L. Stone wrote: >>>>> Am running FBSD-7.x and IMAP WU + sendmail-8.4.x + MySQL-5.0.x >>>>> >>>>> Sorry to bother the list with this but have searched and read everything >>>>> google& horde.org has to offer but I find no solution >>>>> to an important issue I'm having with the installation of horde4. >>>>> >>>>> Although the port maintainer won't have the broken port for horde4, I >>>>> have successfully installed Horde4 plus several common apps including, >>>>> "IMP" app for an IMAP mail service. >>>> >>>> All of the horde4 ports including webmail and groupware have been rewritten >>>> and comitted. AFAIK everything is working properly. You may be missing some >>>> libs or modules, so I would suggest a reinstall. >>>> >>>>> The problem is while I have a good install with the Horde4 base frame and >>>>> the apps, I can login to HORDE just fine, but when going to the IMAP app, >>>>> my login fails. From what I understand, the same Horde login should work >>>>> for the IMP. Reading the login scripts indicates that as well. I'm using >>>>> MySQL (SQL) as the backend for everything that needs a backend so I may >>>>> be able to handle a large number of users. I've installed Washington Uni >>>>> (WU) Imap server and it's listening on the expected port 143. >>>>> >>>>> I've worked on this issue over days and weeks, including reinstalls but >>>>> cannot login to IMP for the mail services. In Horde, I can add users just >>>>> fine and they appear in the MySQL horde database properly. I have a >>>>> couple designated as admins. >>>>> >>>>> If anyone on this list uses horde and maybe knows what I have missed I >>>>> would appreciate any possible tips to check on. Does IMP not use the same >>>>> login as I assUme? >>>> >>>> Not necessarily. It all depends on your auth backend configs for both horde >>>> and the apps. If you're using IMAP auth, you should be able to login to imp >>>> as any regular user on the mail account. It's common to use IMAP auth as >>>> your general auth backend, that way your users will end up in the right >>>> account. You also need either SASL auth or Dovecot auth setup along with >>>> your auth backend. IMAP SSL is required, imp will NOT work with IMAP plain >>>> login unless you hack the configs by hand (bad idea). >>>> >>>> Finally, uncheck the "disable horde test script" box on the main horde >>>> configs under the general tab, save your configs and navigate to >>>> horde/test.php, there is a section near the bottom for testing your IMAP >>>> login. If that isn't successful, you're not going to get much further. If >>>> the option doesn't exist at all, you don't have all the modules you need. >>>> It will also give you an idea about the state of everything else. >>>> >>>> Hope this gets you pointed in the right direction :-) >>>> >>>> Beech >>> >>> I forgot to say use SASL or Dovecot auth if you also want to access and >>> remotely use your sendmail system outside of your horde portal. Horde imp >>> shouldn't have any problems out of the box if your IMAP is otherwise working >>> properly. >>> >>> Beech >>> -- >> >> Good help! >> >> Should I use Dovecot or Dovecot2 ?? >> > >We're using Cyrus-IMAP so I cannot help you with that, but did you >configure your imapserver in >/usr/local/www/horde4/imp/config/backends.php ? > >Specifically the line >'hordeauth' = > >This file itself has a lot of useful information on imap settings. >I assume you checked the imap server log files? > >While on the Horde4 subject, we are running a test installation and find >the perfermance of H4 to be considerably slower the its predecessor. > >Did anyone here experience this? > >Thanks, Yes, I did configure the IMP backends.php or as I recall backends.local.php to override the original settings file. Dunno about the speed as I have never enjoyed that level of use. Jack (^_^) Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american