From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Sep 20 17:13:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA03765 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 17:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA03760 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 17:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id CAA18604; Sun, 21 Sep 1997 02:13:07 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19970921021307.02893@bitbox.follo.net> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 02:13:07 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: ????????????? Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@awfulhak.org Subject: Re: ppp restrictions References: <199709202102.XAA18140@bitbox.follo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.69e In-Reply-To: ; from ????????????? on Sun, Sep 21, 1997 at 03:08:39AM +0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, Sep 21, 1997 at 03:08:39AM +0400, ????????????? wrote: > On Sat, 20 Sep 1997, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > > I like the present model. It allow you to be as strict (or not) as > > you want, but default to a secure value. "Principle of least > > It is not allows to run ppp from "network" group, only from root, so it > not does what I want. Eh? Isn't it still setuid(), so network can do it? My understanding (I've not actually looked more at this, since I don't run PPP at the moment) was ppp owner root, group network, permissions 4550. Thats at least what looks reasonable; otherwise, you need root to use the program and can drop group network entirely. Eivind.