From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Apr 14 13:50:06 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA14409 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 14 Apr 1996 13:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA14396 Sun, 14 Apr 1996 13:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 13:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199604142050.NAA14396@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: Lyndon Nerenberg VE7TCP Subject: Re: bin/1139: uname.1 and uname.c disagree about display ordering Reply-To: Lyndon Nerenberg VE7TCP Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR bin/1139; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Lyndon Nerenberg VE7TCP To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, gnats@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/1139: uname.1 and uname.c disagree about display ordering Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 13:39:34 -0700 >>>>> "Marc" == Marc G Fournier writes: Marc> I may be missing the point here, but option ordering Marc> doesn't seem to make any difference: Read the source and you'll see why. Marc> -a Behave as though the options -m, -n, -r, -s, and -v Marc> were speci- fied. Marc> It doesn't say in what order, just that it will behave Marc> as if all were specified. True, but the implication (as I read it) is that things will come out in the documented order. Your comments point out another bug - the output should match the option ordering specified on the command line. --lyndon