From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 22:14:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26C7E26C; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0207.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56E452432; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO2PR05CA052.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.241.180) by BN1PR05MB107.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.199.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.954.9; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:14:44 +0000 Received: from BN1BFFO11FD035.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c10::1:109) by CO2PR05CA052.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:1429::52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.959.24 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:14:43 +0000 Received: from P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net (66.129.239.16) by BN1BFFO11FD035.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.144.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.959.15 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:14:42 +0000 Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net (172.24.192.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:14:41 -0700 Received: from chaos.localdomain (chaos.jnpr.net [172.21.16.28]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id s5HMEen78486; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:14:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sjg@juniper.net) Received: from chaos (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chaos.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99644580A1; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:14:40 -0700 (PDT) To: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10 In-Reply-To: References: <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> Comments: In-reply-to: Craig Rodrigues message dated "Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:43:55 -0700." From: "Simon J. Gerraty" X-Mailer: MH-E 7.82+cvs; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 22.3.1 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:14:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20140617221440.99644580A1@chaos.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.239.16; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(189002)(199002)(51704005)(50466002)(70486001)(21056001)(104166001)(87936001)(87286001)(76506005)(31966008)(81542001)(76482001)(81342001)(89996001)(88136002)(74662001)(74502001)(4396001)(20776003)(90896003)(81156003)(85306003)(80022001)(95666004)(83072002)(47776003)(50226001)(85852003)(64706001)(79102001)(46102001)(33656002)(102836001)(102176002)(77982001)(44976005)(84676001)(69596002)(68736004)(83322001)(93546004)(86362001)(93916002)(92726001)(92566001)(48376002)(6806004)(93886003)(101356003)(99396002)(57986006)(62966002)(50986999)(77156001)(76176999)(97736001)(42262001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR05MB107; H:P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BL:0; ACTION:Default; RISK:Low; SCL:0; SPMLVL:NotSpam; PCL:0; RULEID: X-Forefront-PRVS: 0245702D7B Received-SPF: SoftFail (: domain of transitioning juniper.net discourages use of 66.129.239.16 as permitted sender) Authentication-Results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 66.129.239.16) smtp.mailfrom=sjg@juniper.net; X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:49:35 +0000 Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , Brooks Davis , Warner Losh , freebsd-current Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:14:54 -0000 >> Why not use fmake in that scenario? > >That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fmake? So long as it is recent enough to have :tu and :tl I would expect so. >If I typed "make something", is there a way inside the make environment to >detect if bmake or fmake was invoked, and error out appropriately? You can test for bmake with .if defined(.PARSEDIR) lack of that means fmake.