From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 21:37:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F157E0BA36 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 21:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D0777E824 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 21:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89LbIN0010290 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 21:37:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214864] [exp-run] test build with lld as /usr/bin/ld Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 21:37:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: exp-run? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 21:37:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214864 --- Comment #48 from Ed Maste --- >From the most recent amd64 exp-run ld errors are as follows: 1 -O: number expected, but got=20 1 cannot open 2: No such file or directory 1 obj/bytecode.o: string table non-null terminated 1 target emulation unknown: -m or at least one .o file required 1 unknown argument: --add-needed 1 unknown argument: -Mmapfile 1 x86_64/units/x86_64-freebsd/i_linux.o: invalid alignment of section headers 2 unknown argument: -fstack-protector 4 ../../js/src/jsarray.o: string table non-null terminated 7 duplicate symbol: 23 undefined symbol: 57 can't create dynamic relocation against symbol: in readonly segment 781 cannot preempt symbol: (ignoring "too many errors emitted, stopping now") The vast majority of the errors are due to the ELF protected visibility iss= ue. Presumably most of these depend on a library (with protected symbols) that = is provided by port that previously failed to build. Most likely we'll just en= d up tagging these with LLD_UNSAFE=3Dyes for now. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=