From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 21 09:24:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17AB16A420 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raglon@packetfront.com) Received: from mail.packetfront.com (mail.packetfront.com [212.247.6.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E936743D53 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:24:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from raglon@packetfront.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.packetfront.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4B0A344D; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:24:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.packetfront.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.packetfront.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31950-06; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:24:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.137] (unknown [192.168.1.137]) by mail.packetfront.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2C1A344B; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:24:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <441FC5E0.5080604@packetfront.com> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:22:40 +0100 From: Ragnar Lonn User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <441E0415.2040908@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <441E0415.2040908@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at packetfront.com Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multiple routing tables X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:24:34 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > I'm looking at a problem where I want onemachine to really look like 2. > this means I want to have 2 separate routing tables if possible. > > I know I could do it with eas if I could user Marco Zec's vimage patches > but I need to have a path forward to 6.x and beyond > > An answer would be to re-implement vimage for newer versions of > FreeBSD but > it's a bit of overkill and I was wondering if anyone had done anything > in this direction? Implementing vimage (or similar) support in 6.x is something we are very interested in and it might be possible for us to help out with such an undertaking, if people thought it worthwhile. Regards, /Ragnar