From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 8 16:27:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7E8106566C for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 16:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@pollux.local.net) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAB28FC1C for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 16:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pollux.local.net (unknown [82.246.30.233]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2024C81EF for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:27:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by pollux.local.net (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 9B53A285E0; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:27:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:27:02 +0100 From: Harald Weis To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101108162702.GA3089@pollux.local.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <20101009203629.GA2135@pollux.local.net> <20101106102955.GB1996@pollux.local.net> <20101107212932.GB32557@pollux.local.net> <201011080940.37941.tijl@coosemans.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201011080940.37941.tijl@coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: linux_base-f10 install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:27:11 -0000 On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:40:28AM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sunday 07 November 2010 22:29:32 Harald Weis wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:29:55AM +0100, Harald Weis wrote: > >> I got two helpful replies to my last question on freebsd-stable, but only > >> off-list. At the second message I understood that I better subscribe > >> to the freebsd-emulation list for my present problem. > >> > >> Following your advice I shall simply run "make -d l install" > >> for my forth experiment. In addition, I shall first remove all ports > >> in order to build linux_base-f10 on a clean system with a minimum > >> number of other ports required for DHCP and mailing for example. This > >> may take some days (as usual for general home work reasons). > > > > Here is the outcome of the fourth attempt to install linux_base-f10. > > > > Short report: as usual, all files are installed in /usr/local. > > > > In detail: > > Output of pkg_info -p linux_base-f10-10_3: > > Prefix(s): > > CWD to /usr/local > > > > Output of pkg_info -L linux_base-f10-10_3 > > shows that all files are installed in /usr/local > > > > Output of ls -ldiosuBFTZ /compat /compat/linux /usr/compat/linux: > > ls: MAC label for //compat: Invalid argument > > ls: MAC label for //compat/linux: Invalid argument > > ls: MAC label for //usr/compat/linux: Invalid argument > > 108 0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - - 10 May 7 18:28:30 2010 > > /compat@ -> usr/compat > > 5817345 2 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel - - 512 Nov 7 15:53:15 2010 > > /compat/linux/ > > 5817345 2 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel - - 512 Nov 7 15:53:15 2010 > > /usr/compat/linux/ > > > > Output of make -V USE_LINUX_PREFIX -V LINUXBASE: > > yes > > /compat/linux > > > > Output of ls -ld /compat/linux: > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Oct 14 14:18 /compat/linux/ > > > > Are the `MAC label' lines significant for the bug ? > > As usual, I've reinstalled pcre to get postfix working again. > > What can I do now ? > > What is the output of 'make -V PREFIX' ? /usr/local