From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 13:43:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A7116A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:43:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2603143D39 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:43:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nunotex@freeshell.org) Received: from nunotex.nunotex (IDENT:root@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.2]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22LhM1b017080 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:43:23 GMT Received: by nunotex.nunotex (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A77AD4459; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:43:03 +0000 (WET) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:43:03 +0000 From: Nuno Teixeira To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040302214303.GA892@nunotex> References: <78841.1078239798@critter.freebsd.dk> <200403021941.40072.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403021941.40072.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE Subject: Re: detecting overheating processors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:43:27 -0000 Hi, In about 10 minutes I put my athlon xp 1700+ from 40,1 C -> 54,6 C using xmbmon monitor. I'm listening mp3 without any scratch! I will stop it now, I like very much my pc :) Bye, Nuno On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 07:41:37PM +0100, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2004 16:03, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <6.0.1.1.1.20040302124613.03af9150@imap.sfu.ca>, Colin Percival > writes: > > > I'm seeing something very interesting with FreeBSD Update: Lots > > >of overheating processors. FreeBSD Update operates by checking > > >MD5 hashes, applying patches, and checking the MD5 hashes of the > > >patched files. If the file is wrong after patching, it downloads > > >the entire file (and verifies its hash). > > > > In my experience MD5 does seem to be a really good CPU heater. > > > > Rather than putting any "burn-in-test" functionality into any one > > program, be it sysinstall or otherwise, I would prefer to have a > > program called "stress" which could be run at any time to test > > hardware. > > I believe sysutils/cpuburn can do exactly that. > > Best regards, > > Arjan -- SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org