From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 14 03:20:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA21168 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:20:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA21086; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:19:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA04346; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:17:49 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803141117.DAA04346@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: sos@FreeBSD.ORG cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au (John Birrell), current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: binutils bloat In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 14 Mar 1998 12:12:45 +0100." <199803141112.MAA00597@sos.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:17:47 -0800 From: Mike Smith Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id DAA21087 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > If we are going to have crosstarget development tools, it should be > completely optional, preferably a port. Uh, this is cross-for-FreeBSD-on-other-architectures. Making this a port would, to put it succinctly, suck. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message