From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 2 9:21:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from icomag.de (foo.icomag.de [195.227.115.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8679F37B439 for ; Thu, 2 May 2002 09:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bgd@localhost) by icomag.de (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g42GIR023964 for ; Thu, 2 May 2002 18:18:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bgd@icomag.de) Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 18:18:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Bogdan TARU X-X-Sender: To: Subject: network design Message-ID: <20020502180817.K22759-100000@fw.cgn.icom> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, I have an unusual question, and hope I'll find the answer on this list. I would like to build a redundant structure of firewalls (2 of them), and I really don't have any idea on how to do that. What I would like is a scheme like: _________ ____________ provider's link ----------| hub |__________| | |_______|\_ _____| FreeBSD fw1|---- switch1 \_/ |____________| ________ _/ \_ _____________ provider's backup link ---| hub2 |/ \___| | |_______|__________| FreeBSD fw2|---- switch2 |____________| But the real question is: how do I assign the same IP address to two interfaces connected to the same hub(s) or switch(es)? I guess this will provide the best redundancy. Any such software? If not, could you describe an alternative for it, or point me to some resources? Thank you, bogdan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message