From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Feb 17 22:50: 8 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD63C37B401 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:50:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E59543FBF for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:50:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1I6o4NS081329 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:50:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h1I6o4Oh081328; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:50:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:50:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200302180650.h1I6o4Oh081328@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Tom Hukins Subject: Re: docs/48366: Update to Dialup firewalling with FreeBSD... Reply-To: Tom Hukins Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/48366; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Hukins To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/48366: Update to Dialup firewalling with FreeBSD... Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 06:49:40 +0000 I have a few comments on what looks like a useful patch: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:47:47AM -0800, Sean Chittenden wrote: > + Enables the new version of IPFW. > + Only do this if you're running FreeBSD 4.X, > + this is the default in newer versions of > + FreeBSD. These a re two separate clauses, so a semicolon or full stop would be more appropriate after "4.X". > - If so, you will need to specifically disable > + If so, you will need to specifically disable In addition, s/will need/need/. > - The ruleset for the firewall > + The rule set for the firewall I notice we use "ruleset" and "rule set" inconsistently through doc and www - I agree that we should prefer "rule set". Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message