From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 23 05:51:02 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22047B83;
 Tue, 23 Jul 2013 05:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trafdev@mail.ru)
Received: from fallback3.mail.ru (fallback3.mail.ru [94.100.176.58])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9919281C;
 Tue, 23 Jul 2013 05:51:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp37.i.mail.ru (smtp37.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.97])
 by fallback3.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id D64A7EF74CB3;
 Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:50:15 +0400 (MSK)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru;
 s=mail2; 
 h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
 bh=wa1+BW5odCevwmqORacUOSEh7tRiDGeFgtw7/kh4JZM=; 
 b=oOj2lyr27/o+LGVIhSefBHuzEjXTJW718OpldzDmTqPfQBePWHI6RYvGUUNgC0nCCzl8O0P39j8CfsqXXv48bytmDXwiS7T0rJc0xuRiF7JepyQNAJAk6eXLuazjYLhw9QSsQUIsVCiSz9vhp060jhVdEptF0IvQLQx9GtUarJw=;
Received: from [50.156.108.197] (port=48064 helo=[192.168.1.116])
 by smtp37.i.mail.ru with esmtpa (envelope-from <trafdev@mail.ru>)
 id 1V1VU6-00043s-UZ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:50:07 +0400
Message-ID: <51EE198B.7040509@mail.ru>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:50:03 -0700
From: trafdev <trafdev@mail.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130628 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT: strange kernel balancer behaviour
References: <51E0E2AF.7090404@mail.ru>
 <CAMOc5cz6gP2N62T4QhbTdVar94O4FSdPDsqktD_9vJ0mYVqt_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <51E44E2F.8060700@mail.ru>
 <CAJ-VmomHHfhExa4g63tT_sf0hTPa2T7jPKQGHrD0fchq=-k+=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <51E455D5.2090403@mail.ru> <20130722200205.GO26412@funkthat.com>
 <51EDA37A.9040200@mail.ru>
 <CAJ-Vmon-WdsUnH33smkf+33yrUHP0p-Fp3ng1ZyTsvLb9tQfVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon-WdsUnH33smkf+33yrUHP0p-Fp3ng1ZyTsvLb9tQfVA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: Not detected
X-Mras: Ok
Cc: Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org,
 John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 05:51:02 -0000

yep, FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p3

On Mon Jul 22 21:05:55 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 22 July 2013 14:26, trafdev <trafdev@mail.ru> wrote:
>> Actually overhead is almost zero, the real problem is in non-equivalent load
>> distribution between processes.
>> As https://lwn.net/Articles/542629/ mentions -
>> "At Google, they have seen a factor-of-three difference between the thread
>> accepting the most connections and the thread accepting the fewest
>> connections;"
>> I'm getting almost same results
>
> On FreeBSD?
>
>
> -adrian
>
>