Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:37:10 +0200 From: Natacha =?iso-8859-1?Q?Port=E9?= <natbsd@instinctive.eu> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I help with thinkpad x220 issues? Message-ID: <20120704073710.GA31763@sigil.instinctive.eu> In-Reply-To: <20120703231540.I46641@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20120523151357.GC97037@sigil.instinctive.eu> <201206300921.41695.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120703083436.GD39287@sigil.instinctive.eu> <201207031820.22657.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120703231540.I46641@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, on Tuesday 03 July 2012 at 23:51, Ian Smith wrote: > > > > > $ sysctl dev.acpi_ibm > > > > > > > > I do not have anything with IBM or Lenovo. > > Is this a Thinkpad model that shows no benefits from loading acpi_ibm? As said elsewhere, its identifier is LEN0068 instead if IBM0068, so a non-patched acpi_ibm fails to bind. However once patched, I can see it bind and provide sysctls. I don't know the extent of what acpi_ibm is supposed to do, but I have to admit I haven't noticed any benefit besides the added sysctls and the control offered by those which actually work (e.g. switching wifi, bluetooth or thinklight). Natacha Porté
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120704073710.GA31763>