From owner-freebsd-net  Wed Dec 12  9:50:14 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from bungo.sgn.sca.se (bungo.sgn.sca.se [193.221.76.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447D337B42F
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:49:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from narya.sgn.sca.se (root@narya.sgn.sca.se [10.192.24.4])
	by bungo.sgn.sca.se (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBCHp1Q16440
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:51:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from joed2000 ([172.24.60.7])
	by narya.sgn.sca.se (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id fBCEFjB33811;
	Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:15:45 -0600 (CST)
Reply-To: <johan.edstrom@sca.com>
From: "Edstrom Johan" <johan.edstrom@sca.com>
To: "Lars Eggert" <larse@ISI.EDU>, "Tom Peck" <tom@masaclaw.co.nz>
Cc: <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: RE: 1 IP - 1 Firewall - 2 Webservers
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:13:28 -0800
Message-ID: <JKEDKFIGOCCAGIKFOMDCGEHMCCAA.johan.edstrom@sca.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <3C168E66.5080702@isi.edu>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

I perhaps should have read all of the mail.....

Well - Squid got X-Forwarded for,
And that't easy to configure Apache to look into, I believe that the 
newer IIS server if that's used also are quite good at that type of 
access.

If I remember correctly doing a reverse proxy under Apache would 
(with the proxy-pass-reverse) produce pretty much the same result.

But another thing comes to mind, squid do produce quite nice logs
as well? 

/JE


Unix is like a wigwam - no gates, no windows, apache inside

##################################
 Johan Edstrom, SCA IT Services    
 johan.edstrom@sca.com
 Tel      : +1 920 727 8821 
 Fax      : +1 920 727 8810
 Cell     : +1 920 205 6472
################################## 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Lars Eggert
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:53 PM
> To: Tom Peck
> Cc: johan.edstrom@sca.com; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: 1 IP - 1 Firewall - 2 Webservers
> 
> 
> Tom Peck wrote:
> 
> > How would this work?  The two web servers aren't accessible straight 
> > from the Internet - traffic goes via the gateway box.
> 
> I bet he forgot to mention that the gateway is also a NAT box. Since 
> squid does app-level relaying, HTTP isn't affected.
> 
> Lars
> -- 
> Lars Eggert <larse@isi.edu>               Information Sciences Institute
> http://www.isi.edu/larse/              University of Southern California
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message