Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:13:50 -0700
From:      "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
To:        "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy@sepulcrum.org>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        acpi@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: apm problem
Message-ID:  <37F890616C995246BE76B3E6B2DBE055011BA135@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This entire discussion reminds me why I've always felt that signed
integers and system software don't mix.

:-)

Bob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> acpi@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Liam J. Foy
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> To: M. Warner Losh
> Cc: acpi@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: apm problem
>=20
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:52:57 -0600 (MDT)
> "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>=20
> > In message: <20040616213946.6f7def3d.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org>
> >             Liam Foy <liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> writes:
> > : > +#define APM_UNKNOWN 0xff		/* Unknown in APM BIOS
spec */
> > :
> > : Do you not mean 0xffffffff ?
> >
> > No.  0xff is the right number here.  The problem is that there's a
> > number of different flag values, some which come directly from the
APM
> > BIOS, and others that are generated by the drivers.
>=20
> Seems am confused. If they are returning 0xffffffff why are we testing
for
> 0xff?
>=20
> >
> > : I agree with the ai_infoversion change above, and from your other
> > : mail about changing the number of batteries from 0 to -1. Has nate
> > : gave any feedback ?
> >
> > Not yet.  He's recovering from a massive disk crash right now.
>=20
> That explains it ;) although he is some what alive.
> >
> > : I have also made some recent changes which have been commited
which
> > : have changed the structure of the apm code. I am willing to change
> > : the code from >=3D 255 to =3D=3D APM_UNKNOWN if it is decided this =
is
what
> > : the correct way and it is agreeded upon.
> >
> > I have the changes in my tree, and will work with Nate to get the
> > right stuff committed.  At the very least the 255's should be
changed
> > to a meaningful constant.
>=20
> Right, keep me informed.
>=20
> >
> > Warner
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37F890616C995246BE76B3E6B2DBE055011BA135>