From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr 15 15:24:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA15845
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 15:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA15828
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 15:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA25865; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 15:02:38 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199704152202.PAA25865@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: ISODEVMAP in cd9660 ?
To: phk@dk.tfs.com
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 15:02:38 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <212.861139167@critter> from "phk@dk.tfs.com" at Apr 15, 97 11:19:27 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Get a grip Terry, those bits are not #ifdef SOMETHINGCRYPTIC...

ISODEVMAP isn't that cryptic, IMO.

Like I said, devfs will obviate the need for the thing for bootable
CDROM's anyway, so it, in particular, should go *if* devfs becomes
standard, in any case.  But the "undocumented" justification for
diking out code is not universally applicable: it was a hedge to
use that as the justification.


					Regards,
					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.