From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 18 23:50:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D371C16A418; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:50:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D5B13C458; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:50:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAINnbif005275; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:49:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:49:51 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20071118.164951.2130804143.imp@bsdimp.com> To: bms@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <47401A31.3050003@FreeBSD.org> References: <20071118100058.GD83818@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20071118102740.E73806@fledge.watson.org> <47401A31.3050003@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: maxim@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/msdosfs msdosfs_vfsops.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:50:57 -0000 In message: <47401A31.3050003@FreeBSD.org> "Bruce M. Simpson" writes: : I recommend we "i.f.f." ie deliberately periodize its use outside of : mathematics and logic; this is a common use; if the strict use is : needed, use '<=>' in comments. There's no 7-bit ASCII glyph for iff : which is another problem. I've never once seen 'i.f.f.' in anything I've read on computer science, mathematics or logic. I fail to see how you can assert that's a common usage. There's nothing wrong with "iff" and there's no problem here that really needs fixing. Anything to replace it would only be more obscure. Warner