Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:33:06 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To:        Oleg Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com>
Cc:        Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available
Message-ID:  <44pqc9vs99.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
In-Reply-To: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2AB@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> (Oleg Moskalenko's message of "Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:50:08 -0700")
References:  <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <CADLo83_r3SgYj6apifN6NTCwZ-ApYbLkyMOS5zcCmTFst_Vcow@mail.gmail.com> <4462e46ul7.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2AB@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oleg Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com> writes:

> Yes, indeed, there was an old sort syntax, where they supported it in a form "+POS1 -POS2". It is a non-POSIX obsolete syntax, so we did not implement it in the new BSD sort. I can add it, if necessary.

If anyone asked for my opinion, I'd say that I'd prefer to see this
syntax stamped out instead; it's unnecessary, confusing, and has been
considered obsolete for decades. A quick look over my workstation's
filesystems shows just a few uses: in texconfig, libtool, something in
X11/config, maybe a handful more.

I'm not sure what the best answer is in practice, but I'm willing to
spend some of my time working on it if that helps.

Be well.
        Lowell



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44pqc9vs99.fsf>