From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 7 15:25:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C189D106566B; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE988FC08; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q57FPggJ054026; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:25:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q57FPgWE054023; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:25:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:25:42 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Martin Wilke In-Reply-To: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 07 Jun 2012 09:25:42 -0600 (MDT) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:25:43 -0000 On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Martin Wilke wrote: > The FreeBSD Xorg Team is pleased to announce Xorg 7.7 Release. We are > very happy to be able to Call for testing shortly after the Xorg team > annouced 7.7 release. Thanks for your work on this! > This CFT is also open for discussion on how we should move forward > with xorg release as we are facing some issues and we would like to > ask for your opinion. Right now we have 2 existing xorg versions in > our Ports Tree. The situation is quite bad due to our poor graphic > card support. That means we do not have much choice but to take it as > how it is now. But with regards to mesa support, we have to face some > new challanges. > > With the new mesa 8.0 release, accelerated support for a number of > older graphic cards was dropped. At the moment we are not sure how to > deal with that.We are thinking of just replacing mesa 7.11 with 8.0 or > making a new flag like WITH_MESA= 7.11.2 / 8.0 in combination with > WITH_NEW_XORG, and let the mesa 7.6.1 set as default together with the > old xorg version. WITH_NEW_XORG is already vague, right now we have two that could be considered new. Would WITH_XORG=7.5 or WITH_XORG=7.7 work? That makes it easier to tell what is being requested; "new" is a relative term.