From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 01:04:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE231065670; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:04:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [70.36.220.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB08E8FC08; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sa-nc-common-178.static.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4T13xWv083491 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 28 May 2011 18:04:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <4DE19678.3050701@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 18:03:54 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201105290040.p4T0exUt007185@svn.freebsd.org> <4DE19678.3050701@freebsd.org> To: Nathan Whitehorn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r222434 - head/sys/powerpc/include X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:04:06 -0000 On May 28, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 05/28/11 19:40, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> Author: marcel >> Date: Sun May 29 00:40:59 2011 >> New Revision: 222434 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222434 >>=20 >> Log: >> The P4080 has 8 cores. Bump MAXCPU to 8 to match. >=20 > Can we just bump this straight to 32, like on other archs? We're very = near to supporting many-way POWER6 and POWER7 systems anyway, and a = single-socket POWER7 can already have 32 CPUs. We could, but I'm not sure I should be concerned about the "scaling" of the various arrays in the kernel due to MAXCPU. This with an eye on small embedded devices that do 2-way SMP. I've never liked this constant anyway to be honest. It's either too big or too small. I don't think it'll ever be right :-) --=20 Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net