From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 20:39:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2AF106568B for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 20:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrea.biscuola@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F52F8FC0A for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 20:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so8894808bwz.3 for ; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:38:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bIwlAZzbZFEy42CmzXiohm23gXNGkOn3cl5jIssRAKk=; b=AWEKW3rpc/cAYAyfksiWPEEXE7TeK5e6ApPmd4hvo22BVzTZhMUvnMQurnrRBFPGny VTxFy10P+vf0o8YCRYbtFTwemkYuQ4ed5TVgbkM2FCjr3+YvyKMm9JRuVUSUNwmOVGSg b+7KYeItlScffZt4/03vVtkQu2UnezSkxSfik= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HjLt5Pdpe+fGRol7OgHb07GBDyYs5HymbQq5kl6mVdkBEioDinE5V2g0xBF6cBO6bz m1rIu9BKOoB30vKjU5JmDvKWR3w6/z38mVuyfwVGWUdfEKbEJFoPR7tBs1WBol/hatKc fHwbbEMjmmbflTayhgxG3zmV1JNjA6Q6sV9aA= Received: by 10.204.48.146 with SMTP id r18mr2519610bkf.61.1262464733712; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:38:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ade.olimpo.local (adsl-ull-118-16.48-151.net24.it [151.48.16.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm4654849bwz.4.2010.01.02.12.38.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:38:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:38:52 +0100 From: Andrea Biscuola To: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20100102213852.f23f4edf.andrea.biscuola@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100102201409.3E50E1CC0C@ptavv.es.net> References: <20100102201409.3E50E1CC0C@ptavv.es.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Abiword port: dependency not satisfied X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:39:01 -0000 On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:14:09 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:19:26 -0600 > > From: "Jeremy Messenger" > > Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org > > > > On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:13:21 -0600, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov > > wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > Remove tarball from /usr/ports/distfiles/AbiWord and make install again. > > > > If I read his email correct, his problem is with boost-libs. > > > > > 02.01.2010 13:36, Andrea Biscuola __________: > > >> Hi! > > >> > > >> I tried to install abiword from freebsd ports tree and i have > > >> encountered a problem with "boost-libs" (a port dependency). > > >> When fetch try to download the source tar.bz from port's sites, > > >> fetch give me this response:"Requested Range Not Satisfiable". > > >> After having this response, fetch try to download the port from > > >> another site with the same result. > > >> Does this problem are known to you? > > > > No problem here. You can try to delete the boost tarball(s) in your > > /usr/ports/distfiles/ and make sure to checkout latest ports tree. Then > > try it again. > > > > By the way, we don't maintain boost-libs. You should contact to the > > correct maintainer. > > It may be worth noting that boost was restructured rather significantly > in July and updated to version 1.41 just this week. I suspect that you > may have some bits of the old boost port mixed in with the current > one. I would suggest removing boost-libs and an other boost ports > (pkg_info -c boost\*) and then re-install them. Be sure that your ports > tree is up to date and that you are installing boost-libs-1.41. > > I just tried and the tarball is fetchable, although the transfer rate I > got from sourceforge was painfully slow. > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) > Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) > E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 Hi Kevin Probably, the problem is with my port's tree, because my workstation was installed completely (with xfce and other packages) during this week. After your explanation, i think that a port's tree upgrade is the correct solution, because boost-libs of my ports-tree correspond at 1.39 version. A confirmation of this theory, is that mantainer's have updated the port during this week. :-) Problem solved. Thanks for your time guys. Best regards. -- Andrea Biscuola Jabber (IM): andrea.biscuola@jabber.org