From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 11:13:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F4E16A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:13:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D963443D46; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:13:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14BDCg2060702; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:13:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14BDBC0047069; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:13:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k14BDBNm047068; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:13:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:13:11 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Dmitry Morozovsky Message-ID: <20060204111311.GA47047@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060204135216.P84050@woozle.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060204135216.P84050@woozle.rinet.ru> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: stable@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, Warner Losh Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:13:20 -0000 On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:54:14PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote.. > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > [snip] > > WB> > My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox > WB> > breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox > WB> > person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags. > WB> > WB> I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as > WB> what normal release builds use. Nothing more, nothing less. > > Well, why not take the portbuild approach then? > > Build standard tinderboxen with standard source and compile flags set, and > *also* experimental sets with experimental flags and possibly experimental > source patches... Probably needs more hardware to keep a reasonable tinderbox frequency. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org