From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 23 14:41:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA00682 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:41:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pagesz.net (root@nina.pagesz.net [208.194.157.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA00668 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:41:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jferg@2boot.com) Received: from .pagesz.net (isabella-51.pagesz.net [208.194.157.51]) by pagesz.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP id RAA09644; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:40:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 98 17:31:44 PDT From: joe ferguson Subject: Re: Does this deserve send-pr? To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Hans Huebner X-PRIORITY: 3 (Normal) X-Mailer: Chameleon 4.6.3, TCP/IP for Windows, NetManage Inc. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have to agree with Hans. If there is a user command which can crash the kernel, it is a gross security violation as well as a violation of Unix philosophy. I've had enough such problems with popular desktop operating systems! ------------------------------------- Name: joe ferguson E-mail: jferg@2boot.com VOICE 919-468-8150 FAX: 919-468-5288 http://www.2boot.com Date: 4/23/98 Time: 5:31:44 PM . To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message