From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 28 11:59:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AB316A4BF for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4659343F85 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:59:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blueeskimo@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 22419 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Aug 2003 18:59:46 -0000 Received: from dsl-cust-145.openweb.ca (EHLO [64.39.186.145]) (64.39.186.145) by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 28 Aug 2003 20:59:46 +0200 From: Adam McLaurin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1062086767.35417.6.camel@farmer.lc.ca.gov> References: <1062086767.35417.6.camel@farmer.lc.ca.gov> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AU9Jg+B5KOk0Edi1oL2q" Message-Id: <1062097184.57902.61.camel@jake> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:59:44 -0400 Subject: Re: Ports Installed Are Newer Than Tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 18:59:50 -0000 --=-AU9Jg+B5KOk0Edi1oL2q Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 14:35, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > It seems that the ports I have installed on my system are newer than the > ones in the ports tree. If I run portversion, I get output that looks > like this: >=20 > farmer# portversion -v -L=3D > XFree86-Server-4.3.0_6 > succeeds port (port has 4.3.0_5) > cdrtools-2.0_1 > succeeds port (port has 2.0) > gconf-1.0.9_3 > succeeds port (port has 1.0.9_2) > gdm2-2.4.1.4 > succeeds port (port has 2.4.1.3_1) > gnomegames2-2.2.1_1 > succeeds port (port has 2.2.1) >=20 > And the list goes on. I've updated my ports tree using cvsup and it > finishes successfully. I've also run portsdb -uU to update the indexes > however the problem persists. >=20 > I'm stumped and don't know what else to check. Any ideas? I'm running > 4.8. Double-check that you only have one copy of these ports installed. I've seen this problem before, only to discover multiple copies of the same port were installed. Some 'pkgdb -F' might be in order here .. Also, I'd recommend 'make index' from /usr/ports instead of using 'portsdb -U'. Much more reliable! However, it seems that INDEX builds are failing right now anyway. Kris has been sending out emails to Ports all day with failure reports. --=20 Adam McLaurin --=-AU9Jg+B5KOk0Edi1oL2q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/TlEgt+DSc2Q4lGYRAkbFAJ9rmnSAlAem/SdhwX7AQgLMto+ctwCfVZwg y/Eg4iBXZtujoSFn1ryAUJw= =2RUD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AU9Jg+B5KOk0Edi1oL2q--