From owner-cvs-sbin  Sun May 17 09:01:36 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-sbin>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA04494
          for cvs-sbin-outgoing; Sun, 17 May 1998 09:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-sbin)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (omega.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.95])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA04391;
          Sun, 17 May 1998 09:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from fenner@parc.xerox.com)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <32553(1)>; Sun, 17 May 1998 09:00:28 PDT
Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177519>; Sun, 17 May 1998 09:00:11 -0700
To: dg@root.com
cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org,
        cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/dump dumprmt.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 May 98 00:48:08 PDT."
             <199805170748.AAA16545@implode.root.com> 
Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 09:00:08 PDT
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <98May17.090011pdt.177519@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-sbin@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199805170748.AAA16545@implode.root.com> you write:
>>   The rdump request/response protocol can not invoke Nagle and cannot cause
>>   SWS, so this has no negative effects.
>
>   "should not"...clearly it _can_! :-)

It does not actually cause SWS despite triggering SWS avoidance.  I
was just trying to make it clear that I have thought about this and
am sure that rdump is not suddenly going to start bashing WANs because
of this change.

  Bill