Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:05:52 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 261555] 410.pkg-audit: suggested patch to improve expiry by handling anticongestion delay better
Message-ID:  <bug-261555-7788-Nx2FALlaUr@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-261555-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-261555-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261555

--- Comment #2 from wbe@psr.com ---
OK... I now have my first example in 14.0 of vuln.xml NOT being fetched at
00:30, so you do still have an anticongestion delay.

With this new information, I see at least 3 options:
1) If you use my patch, you don't need this new, separate
   "fetch vuln.xml hours earlier" job; you can go back to fetching it when
   the security test is run;
2) Keep the fetch-hours-earlier job, in which case you don't need my patch,
   nor do you need the +600 (10 minute) margin in 410.pkg-audit, and if
   you're doing all the anticongestion fetches earlier, maybe you can
   eliminate doing the anticongestion delay again at 3 AM;
3) Ignoring my patch and doing nothing works, too, but leaves future
   programmers to wonder why there's a 10 minute delay in the code.
 -WBE

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261555-7788-Nx2FALlaUr>